Fall 2008: MWF
12:00-12:50pm, LA 107
Instructor: Dr.
John Charles Goshert
Office: LA
121t
Hours: T/R 11:30-1:00 and by appointment
Phone:
863-6288
email: gosherjo@uvu.edu
One might argue
that at the heart of our current cultural
crises is an almost absolute national ignorance, and perhaps
even—especially
among dominant populations—a will to ignorance, particularly where it
concerns
matters of
Accordingly, this section of multi-ethnic literature focuses
on the significance of historical knowledge and exploration to a range
of marginalized
communities, not only as defined by ethnicity, but also by gender,
class,
geography, and sexuality. Over the
semester we’ll read texts published in the last few years that
foreground the
acquisition and examination of historical consciousness, from Charles
Johnson’s
1991 “neo-slave” narrative to Sherman Alexie’s 2007 time travel
novel.
We’ll also look at critical works in the
field, both as they relate to individual works, particular ethnic
groups, and
to concerns of historical literacy generally.
Frank Chin, Donald
Duk,
Paul Beatty, White Boy Shuffle,
Peter Bacho, Dark Blue Suit,
Sarah Schulman, Shimmer,
Susan Choi, American
Woman,
Barbara Z. Thaden. “Charles Johnson’s Middle Passage as Historiographic Metafiction.” College English 59.7 (1997) : 753-66.
Charles Johnson. “Exchange Value.” The Sorcerer’s Apprentice 27-40
Frank Chin, “Railroad Standard Time.” The Chinaman Pacific and Frisco R.R. Co. 1-7.
---. “Pidgin Contest Along I-5.” Bulletproof Buddhists (415-29).
LH Stallings, “‘I’m Goin Pimp Whores’: The Goines Factor . . .” New Centennial Review 3.3 (2003): 175-203.
Vince Gotera, “Moments in the Wilderness.” MELUS 29.1 (2004): 19-40
Sarah Schulman. “When We Were Very Young.” My American History 125-48.
Daniel Boyarin et al., “Strange Bedfellows,” Queer Theory and the Jewish Question.
Janet Halley, “Like Race Arguments,” What’s Left of Theory? 40-74.
Arab American Fiction: Jarrar, “A Frame for
the Sky”; Kahf,
“Manar of
“Airport.” Dinarzad’s Children, Eds. Pauline
Kaldas and
Iranian American Fiction: Tabib, “Tuesdays”;
Namazi,
“Finding Peace in the Iranian Army.” A
World Between, Eds. Persis Karim and
Mohammad Khorrami, George
Braziller 1999.
Robert Shimabukuro, “Awakening,” Born in
Ward Churchill. “Indians
R Us.” Acts
of Rebellion 223-44.
Using reading skills and strategies of
argument learned in
courses such as Engl. 2600 (Critical Intro to Literature) and 2010
(Research
Writing), students are expected, from the opening of the course, to be
prepared
to actively, critically read literary texts, and to respond orally and
through
writing. This course will add to those
skills and strategies through lecture, class discussion, and engagement
with
current critical approaches of responding to literature.
2-3 page response papers are due
periodically, beginning
September 10. While this paper is,
primarily, an expression of your opinion, you should nonetheless
develop a
cogent, well-written argument. The best
responses take on a specific topic from lecture, class discussions,
presentations (or, of course, from your own reading alone), which is
then
worked out in some critical/analytic detail.
Avoid trying to fit an entire week’s reading—an entire novel or
other
extended text—into your response, since this leaves you with such a
broad scope
that any detailed examination is rather difficult.
See two
response papers from fall 2007
Response papers
from September 2008: #1 and #2
The term project is essentially a research
argument—typically a paper of 10-12 pages—on any topic within the scope
of the
course (Multi-Ethnic American art and culture, 1968 to the present). You may use any of the course texts/authors
or develop a project on texts, authors, music, films, art, and so on of
personal interest with one caveat: ensure in making your choice that
your
subject matter merits close examination, and that you can develop a
research question
and a critical apparatus to explore it.
Successful students tend to settle on at least a broad subject
and begin
the research and writing process shortly following the midterm. Feel free to write a term paper proposal if
you want sustained feedback; this is optional, but due on or before
Monday 10
November.
Grade Distribution/Notes
Response papers: 30%
Take-Home Midterm: 20%
Final Project: 30%
Attendance/Participation: 20%
August
W 27 Course
introduction
F 29 Middle Passage
1-70
M 1 No
Class
W 3 Middle 71-119
F 5 Middle
120-84
Johnson
(handout)
Thaden
(reserve)
W 10 Donald Duk 1-71
Response
paper #1 due
F 12 Donald Duk
M 15 Donald 72-153
W 17 complete Donald Duk
F 19 Chin (reserve)
Response
paper #2 due
W 24 White 59-150
F 26 White 151-202
Stallings
(reserve)
W 1 Dark
Blue Suit
1-64
F 3 Dark 65-112
Gotera (reserve)
Response
paper #3 due
W 8 Shimmer 1-61
F 10 Shimmer 62-117
W 15 Shimmer 180-242
F 17 No Class
Schulman
(reserve)
Boyarin
(reserve)
W 22 Halley (reserve)
Midterm
prep
F 24 Midterm
assigned
W 29 continue film
F 31 complete film
Midterm Due
M 3 Arab
American
fiction
W 5 Arab American
fiction
F 7 No Class
W 12 American Woman
1-90
F 14 American
91-177
W 19 American 233-310
F 21 Complete American
Woman
Response
paper #4 due
W 26 No Class
F 28 No Class
M 1 Flight
1-58
W 3 Flight 59-130
F 5 Complete
Flight
Response
paper #5 due
W 10 Last Day of
Class
Final Exam Week
M 10
W 17 Term Project due
Response
paper #6 due